The leader of the Democratic Party to the City Council of Campobello, Giuseppe Sferraza having read the note on the complaints submitted by the President of the Consortium Three Sources Canicattì, relating a series of alleged irregularities and illegal administrative bodies, such as EAS. Consozrio the Volta and Girgenti water damaged economically and that they would not, for precisely the Consortium Three Springs, wants to understand what is this succedendo.In repartee you try to meet, representing some truth that even at emrgono documentary. Joseph Sferrazza October 7 at 18:23: Hello I am Joseph Sferrazza, leader of the PD to the City Council of Campobello, a former candidate for Sindaco.Ho read his note on "theft" of € 150 million of water and the action brought by Sorgenti.La Three weeks ago, or earlier, you had to hold a meeting at the request of the Mayor in Campobello Terms for termination of the Three Sorgenti.Le wonder if this happened they would not of made use of three sources? I think you and I would like to do a query to the Mayor to make me explain the reasons for his stance in favor of the dissolution of the consortium, but before doing so I would like some information on his part, in sense of the dissolution of the consortium's move is a move of the center and then all of a political maneuver to remain silent about responsibility or not? Thanks in anticipo.Salvatore Petrotto October 7 at 9:52: It is not impossible that immediately proceed to the dissolution of the Consortium Three other natura.E Sorgenti.Il problem is' important to understand that the end must make the assets of Consorzio.La concession granted by the Region for the pumping of water is fine, because Paradoxically, Girgenti Waters has no license, while the Consortium sipo need to understand why the region today, having appointed a commissioner in the person of Eng. Puccio, to ensure the passage of water systems Girgenti, through the Regional Water and Waste Agency (election contested by bodies which carried it out. Puccio A name must have been a direct focus on the region and not a related company, since it is an commissioner of a public consortium made up exclusively of local authorities), has not yet done so to rename a new commissario.Bisogna also regularly whether converted or dissolve the Consortium, formed in 1917.Bisogna yet to understand why the mayors of Canicattì, Caves, but Campobello Ravanusa and also, perhaps, not only refrain from participating in meetings of the consortium, but also take the appropriate decisions, which consist, in short, in two points: dissolve the consortium, subject to verification and any subdivisions in units heritage among those members who are then converting it back to the municipalities or other scopi.Alcuni mayors, that have acted like ostriches, hiding their heads in the sand and in places more or less decided not to decide appropriate niente.Si seek only extra-territorial meetings and there you will find where the bylaws must take the necessary decisions within the Assembly and that is a consortium that has often been regularly convened over the past two years, and regularly deserted by the mayors say that in words and loose with the facts remain attached to a stalemate, with heavy responsibilities on them.
0 comments:
Post a Comment